Film: Likon Super 200

I accompanied my nanay a couple of nights ago when we stopped by at Dollarama to buy stuff. At the front entrance I was surprised to see a small shelf filled with cheap film called “Likon Super 200.” This got my attention mainly because; a.) it’s cheap film, and who doesn’t love cheap film?; b.) Its name is LIKON. It kind of reminds me of the camera Nikon and the Chinese film Lucky, ha ha. Nanay asked me if I wanted anything so I decided to grab 5 rolls. Tatay‘s reluctant though. He told me not to buy it because, well, it’s cheap film (I guess that answers my first question, he he), and what can you expect from a cheap film?

As soon as I got the rolls I told some photographer friends back in the Philippines about it, and Kuya Jerome mentioned that it’s probably from the same manufacturer as Lucky. I took his word, but because I am a very inquisitive person, I decided to, well, compare both films.

At first glance both films look the same as they have the yellow, red and white colors for packaging. I got my Lucky Super 200 when I went on a trip to the Philippines (thanks Ate Zoe of Lomo Manila, btw), so I’m, well, lucky to have a fresh cassette on hand (okay, pardon the pun). The designs of the cassettes are different though, and funny thing is that the Likon looks cheaper than the Lucky, considering that they’re about the same price (if I’m going to do some conversion, I think my Lucky cassettes are Php 10 more expensive — I guess that’s explains it, but that doesn’t really make a difference, does it?).

When I checked the films, I saw that the films are a bit different in color. Likon Super 200 seems lighter than the Lucky one. I don’t know if there’s an effect with regards to color and quality of the photos (or prints, if you decide to get one instead of having the negatives scanned). I tried using Lucky Super 200 with my Nikon F55/N55 and I definitely loved the results; there’s grain but just enough to give a certain feel to my photos.

I tried searching the internet in case there’s a website for the said film, but I only found two Flickr accounts with photos taken using Likon. The quality’s not bad, for a $1 worth of film. It also seems like the film’s only available here in Canada, and at Dollarama.

Photos were taken using my mom’s Sony Cybershot s750.

Discuss - 3 Comments

  1. Hey, I use the Likon 200 all the time. I convert it to redscale too, it’s so cheap and the results are damn fine :-)

    -Eric

  2. jay says:

    i really like this film. I too made it into redscale. i actually find it to be pretty good redscale at that! its fun and affordable to experiment with this film. sadly i think dollarama is going to stop selling it

  3. angela says:

    ^ Are you serious? re: stop selling it. I must panic buy. >_>;

What if no one’s watching?

This nook is the culmination of a project that was postponed so many times after getting my first camera in 2004. I've consciously recognized my love for images and photography during that year, so, here it is. So, what if no one is watching? I scan my environment more carefully and take my time in breathing in the beauty that surrounds me, without worrying about other people's impressions or reactions. I hope you enjoy looking at my images the way I enjoyed the process of creating them.

Categories

Archives